Reports that design themselves
Dashboards and reports generated from intent. The "can you build me a view" backlog disappears; humans curate what the AI drafts.
Build weekly revenue by region, versus last year.
| West | 1.6M |
| North | 1.4M |
| South | 1.2M |
The "can you build me a view" backlog disappears. You curate, the system drafts.
For years, getting a new dashboard meant filing a request and waiting. You described what you wanted, it joined a queue, and weeks later something close-ish arrived. The “can you build me a report” backlog was a permanent fixture.
Now the report generates from a sentence. You describe the view you need in plain language and a draft comes back in seconds, not sprints. The queue stops being a queue because the first draft no longer needs a person to hand-build it. What used to be the whole job becomes the starting point.
Why now
- Generation got good enough. Models can turn a description into a real, structured report: sensible chart types, groupings, a layout that holds together. Not perfect, but a credible first draft to react to instead of a blank canvas.
- The semantic layer makes it trustworthy. Pointed at raw tables, generation produces one-off dashboards that each invent their own “revenue” and quietly disagree. Drafted from governed definitions, every view inherits the same metrics as the rest of BI, so consistency is built in, not bolted on. Generation supplies the speed; the semantic layer supplies the trust.
What it looks like
A revenue operations lead types, “build me a weekly churn view by segment.”
A naive tool would guess at a churn formula, grab the first segment column it finds, and produce something subtly wrong. A grounded system resolves “churn” to the governed metric, scopes “segment” to the agreed grouping, and assembles a draft (a weekly trend, a breakdown by segment, a table of the segments moving most) in seconds.
Then the human takes over: excludes trial accounts, renames a confusing label, certifies the result. What landed was a near-complete draft, not a ticket to start from scratch. The minutes spent are editorial, not mechanical.
Where it’s heading
From drafting to curating as the default shape of the work. As generation gets more reliable, the analyst spends less time assembling and more time deciding: which views deserve certifying, which definitions need fixing, what the organization should be looking at that nobody’s asked for yet. The report builder becomes a report editor, and the backlog thins because most requests are answered the moment they’re asked.
How we think about it
Generation removes the grunt work; humans keep editorial control. A draft is not a decision. The system should produce the view fast and from governed definitions, but the choice to certify it, to call it the official number, stays with a person. That’s where domain knowledge and accountability live, the same boundary we draw for governed contributions: propose freely, but keep approval human and on the record.
Hold that line and the request backlog is no longer a fact of life. The machine drafts, the analyst curates, and the view shows up in minutes with a person’s judgment still on it.
Reports that design themselves, in short.
Does this just produce throwaway dashboards nobody trusts?
Only if it generates against raw tables. Drafted from a governed semantic layer, every view uses the same definitions as everything else, so a generated dashboard is consistent with the certified ones. A human still reviews and certifies before it counts as official.
What happens to the analyst's job?
It moves from building to curating. Instead of assembling the hundredth sales view by hand, the analyst reviews a draft, fixes what's off, and decides what gets certified. The grunt work goes; the editorial judgment stays.
How is a generated report kept consistent with the rest of BI?
Through the semantic layer. Because the report is drafted from shared definitions rather than ad hoc SQL, "revenue" on a generated view means what it means everywhere else, and views agree instead of quietly diverging.
Keep exploring
Chat with your data
Conversational analytics becomes the front door to BI. You ask in plain language; the system answers from governed definitions, not guesses.
Insights that surface themselves
The system narrates what changed and why, proactively, instead of waiting to be asked.
Alerts that find the right person
Metrics watched continuously; anomalies and threshold breaches reach the right person with context, not noise.
Where could this take your BI?
If this is the direction you want to head, we should talk.